He jumps his breakfast and dies of a heart attack | A Hard Swallow
General Mood Misconceptions Statistics Blog News For Health By letter drugs Contraceptive Pill Statins Permaculture intermittent fasting Premium Pet Food Nutrition Definition Books Eat less? GMO Food For Drinking Beer Oils Vegetable Seasonings Honey Milk Products Meat Egg Bread For cooking recipes By By By myths masticatory mono-diet Paleolithic Diet Gluten Free Vegetarian meals per Call to order! Sugar
Here is the front page of the newspaper, "Health in the clear", dated August 5, 2013 in which it explains how a 45 year old man died of a heart attack in the morning after missing his breakfast.
Of course this is a sham, as the paper elsewhere. assoziativgesetz So I'm not doing you a remake of the excellent articles Legorafi.fr information site, I rather wish treat a topic: the importance of breakfast in human health.
In science news, researchers at the prestigious School of Public Health Harvard published an epidemiological study on eating breakfast or not with the risk of coronary heart disease (1).
This study, this result (with the 27% figure lighthouse taken by all media), these findings strangely reminds me of a previous study on the diet that proved that vegetarians had 12% less risk of death than omnivores.
This study, like all epidemiological studies have major limitations in interpreting the results, but also important methodological limitations, which can skew these results. 1 st Point: The acquisition of epidemiological data is fragile
This is a classic point that is often singled out in these epidemiological studies. Indeed, researchers assoziativgesetz generally recover huge amount of data on the dietary habits of people followed with questionnaires to complete.
These questionnaires (FFQ English Food Frequency Questionnaire for) are often quite spaced in time, every 3 months assoziativgesetz in some cases, sometimes every year and we will see that in the case of our study questionnaire was administered every 4 year old!
Individuals subjected to these questionnaires must demonstrate an almost exceptional memory and remarkable honesty to provide the most realistic and most consistent results.
Unfortunately, we know that foods with the most beneficial (such as fruits and vegetables) auras are often overestimated, while foods with the least beneficial auras are underestimated them. 2 nd Point: No cause and effect is demonstrated
Specifically, the study referred to here shows an increased risk of coronary heart disease in men not taking breakfast risk, we can hypothesize that breakfast somehow protects heart function, according probably an unknown quantity of factors.
Unfortunately, researchers can not control all the factors that might influence the association between the target variables. These factors are not considered, assoziativgesetz or under or overestimated, expressed confusion.
Confounders weaken associations between variables, and must at all costs be included assoziativgesetz in the statistical models. Conventionally, smoking, body mass index, or age are confounding assoziativgesetz factors generally taken into account.
However, the exact composition of the diet, exercise specially made by individuals or the type of oil used are examples from other confounding factors that can distort a demonstrated link.
No, science has already ruled on the issue in a 2007 study that showed the influence of sponsors on the results of scientific studies (2). Once a company is financing a study on one of its products, assoziativgesetz the results of this study will never be negative.
School of Public Health at Harvard who is the source of this study is at the forefront of global nutrition. The researchers of this team have excellent experience in the management and treatment of epidemiological studies.
The first point of this study, not least, the collection of dietary data through questionnaires. The authors of this study, "feeding [participants] in the past year is determined assoziativgesetz every four years [...]."
In other words, every 4 years, participants must complete a questionnaire about their diet last year. This method thus obscures the three years following the survey. Of the 16 ann
General Mood Misconceptions Statistics Blog News For Health By letter drugs Contraceptive Pill Statins Permaculture intermittent fasting Premium Pet Food Nutrition Definition Books Eat less? GMO Food For Drinking Beer Oils Vegetable Seasonings Honey Milk Products Meat Egg Bread For cooking recipes By By By myths masticatory mono-diet Paleolithic Diet Gluten Free Vegetarian meals per Call to order! Sugar
Here is the front page of the newspaper, "Health in the clear", dated August 5, 2013 in which it explains how a 45 year old man died of a heart attack in the morning after missing his breakfast.
Of course this is a sham, as the paper elsewhere. assoziativgesetz So I'm not doing you a remake of the excellent articles Legorafi.fr information site, I rather wish treat a topic: the importance of breakfast in human health.
In science news, researchers at the prestigious School of Public Health Harvard published an epidemiological study on eating breakfast or not with the risk of coronary heart disease (1).
This study, this result (with the 27% figure lighthouse taken by all media), these findings strangely reminds me of a previous study on the diet that proved that vegetarians had 12% less risk of death than omnivores.
This study, like all epidemiological studies have major limitations in interpreting the results, but also important methodological limitations, which can skew these results. 1 st Point: The acquisition of epidemiological data is fragile
This is a classic point that is often singled out in these epidemiological studies. Indeed, researchers assoziativgesetz generally recover huge amount of data on the dietary habits of people followed with questionnaires to complete.
These questionnaires (FFQ English Food Frequency Questionnaire for) are often quite spaced in time, every 3 months assoziativgesetz in some cases, sometimes every year and we will see that in the case of our study questionnaire was administered every 4 year old!
Individuals subjected to these questionnaires must demonstrate an almost exceptional memory and remarkable honesty to provide the most realistic and most consistent results.
Unfortunately, we know that foods with the most beneficial (such as fruits and vegetables) auras are often overestimated, while foods with the least beneficial auras are underestimated them. 2 nd Point: No cause and effect is demonstrated
Specifically, the study referred to here shows an increased risk of coronary heart disease in men not taking breakfast risk, we can hypothesize that breakfast somehow protects heart function, according probably an unknown quantity of factors.
Unfortunately, researchers can not control all the factors that might influence the association between the target variables. These factors are not considered, assoziativgesetz or under or overestimated, expressed confusion.
Confounders weaken associations between variables, and must at all costs be included assoziativgesetz in the statistical models. Conventionally, smoking, body mass index, or age are confounding assoziativgesetz factors generally taken into account.
However, the exact composition of the diet, exercise specially made by individuals or the type of oil used are examples from other confounding factors that can distort a demonstrated link.
No, science has already ruled on the issue in a 2007 study that showed the influence of sponsors on the results of scientific studies (2). Once a company is financing a study on one of its products, assoziativgesetz the results of this study will never be negative.
School of Public Health at Harvard who is the source of this study is at the forefront of global nutrition. The researchers of this team have excellent experience in the management and treatment of epidemiological studies.
The first point of this study, not least, the collection of dietary data through questionnaires. The authors of this study, "feeding [participants] in the past year is determined assoziativgesetz every four years [...]."
In other words, every 4 years, participants must complete a questionnaire about their diet last year. This method thus obscures the three years following the survey. Of the 16 ann
No comments:
Post a Comment